Welcome to UVtalk.com - You are viewing as a Guest, please click here to register and enjoy all our features...



Register FAQ Members List Calendar Video Chat Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   UVTalk > Main Forum Categories > "Sun" Science

"Sun" Science Get The Facts Regarding UV Exposure & Vitamin D

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2008, 07:50 PM   # 1   Show Printable Version
Administrator, ITA supporter
 
Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul-30-2007
Member No.: 3
Gender: 1
Posts: 18,816
My Mood:
Rep Power: 324997 Bill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond repute
Default UV index and skin cancers

Geographic variation and risk of skin cancer in US women. Differences between melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma.

Qureshi AA, Laden F, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ.
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. aqureshi@partners.org
BACKGROUND: Occurrences of melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) have been associated with varying geography. Our goal was to evaluate differences in risk of these skin cancers according to residence at varying UV indices at 3 time points. METHODS: Prospective 1984-2002 study of 84 836 female nurses who lived in different UV index regions of the United States at birth and at 15 or 30 years of age. The outcome measure was diagnosis of melanoma, SCC, or BCC. RESULTS: During the 18-year study, 420 cases of melanoma, 863 cases of SCC, and 8215 cases of BCC occurred. At 30 years of age, age-adjusted risks for SCC were 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.76) and 1.90 (95% CI, 1.51-2.36) for women residing in states with a UV index of 6 (medium) and 7 or more (high), respectively. Although elevated, the age-adjusted risk of BCC at 30 years of age associated with residence in these states was substantially less. Although the risk of melanoma was not elevated for women living in these states at 30 years of age, it was significantly elevated among women living in states with UV indices of 6 at birth and at 15 years of age. There was no material change in risk estimates with multivariate adjustment. For women who reported living in states with UV indices of 7 or more at all 3 time points, the multivariate risk of SCC was highest. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of SCC is independently affected by residence in locations with medium and high UV indices; the gradient of risk is weaker for BCC; and the risk of melanoma does not change significantly across this gradient.
PMID: 18332296 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
__________________
I didn't mean it. Please don't cry...
Bill is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 07:54 PM   # 2   Show Printable Version
Administrator, ITA supporter
 
Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul-30-2007
Member No.: 3
Gender: 1
Posts: 18,816
My Mood:
Rep Power: 324997 Bill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond reputeBill has a reputation beyond repute
Default

High UV index is a risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma, a mild risk factor for Basal cell carcinoma, but does not increase your risk of melanoma.
__________________
I didn't mean it. Please don't cry...
Bill is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 11:03 AM   # 3   Show Printable Version
UV Geek Squad
 
solarmeter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May-29-2008
Location: Lake St Clair
Member No.: 235
Gender: 1
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0 solarmeter is on a distinguished road
Default

UV Index divided by 40 = erythemally effective UV (Eeff or Ery) in units of EAS weighted W/m².

So a UVI of 12 / 40 = 0.30 W/m² Ery. This is the maximum allowed dose rate for sunbeds in Europe as of June last year... the "EU Norm".
solarmeter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright 2008 UVTalk.com
Skin Designed By A Design Forum


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:54 PM.


The submitting user grants UVtalk.com and it's owners the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive and fully
sublicensable right and license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from,
distribute, perform and display such Content (in whole or part) worldwide. UVtalk.com, advertisers, sponsors, are
not responsible for content with respect to individual posts.
This site is not intended to be a replacement for advice received from your medical professionals.

© 2007-2009 UVtalk.com